Majority
p. 323In the Matter of Protectors of Pine Oak Woods, Inc., et al., Appellants, v City of New York et al., Respondents. [746 NYS2d 264]
As the Supreme Court correctly noted in its well-reasoned decision, there is no likelihood that the petitioners will succeed on the merits of their underlying petition. Thus, the Supreme Court providently denied the petitioners’ motion for a preliminary injunction (see CPLR 6311; Doe v Axelrod, 73 NY2d 748 , 750; Grant Co. v Srogi, 52 NY2d 496 , 517; Sheffield Towers Rehabilitation & Health Care Ctr. v Novello, 293 AD2d 182 ; Mosseri v Fried, 289 AD2d 545 ). Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- W. T. Grant Co. v. Srogi 52 NY2d 496 at 517 p. 323
- Sheffield Towers Rehabilitation & Health Care Center v. Novello 293 AD2d 182 p. 323
- Mosseri v. Fried 289 AD2d 545 p. 323