Majority
p. 396In the Matter of Nicola Infante, Jr., et al., Appellants, v Francis X. Curley et al., Respondents. [746 NYS2d 617]
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion by, in effect, denying the appellants’ motion to vacate the order dated August 20, 2002. The appellants failed to establish a reasonable excuse for their default or a meritorious claim (see Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 NY2d 138 ).
The appellants’ remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit (see Matter of Boy-land v Board of Elections of City of N.Y., 122 AD2d 902 , 903). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, McGinity, Crane and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v. A. C. Dutton Lumber Co. 67 NY2d 138 p. 396
- Boyland v. Board of Elections 122 AD2d 902 at 903 p. 396