McCall v. Matondo

297 A.D.2d 397 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2002-08-28 English

Contents

Majority

p. 397

In the Matter of James P. McCall et al., Appellants, v Betty Matondo et al., Respondents, et al., Respondent.

[746 NYS2d 619]

The Supreme Court correctly found that the proceeding was untimely (see Election Law § 16-102 [2]).

The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Florio, McGinity, Crane and Cozier, JJ., concur.