Majority
p. 397In the Matter of Michael Neibauer et al., Appellants, v Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondent,
p. 398and Gary Sinawski et al., Respondents. [746 NYS2d 616]
The Supreme Court properly dismissed the instant proceeding since the petitioners did not meet any of the requirements specified in Election Law § 16-102 (1), and thus lacked standing to challenge the subject designating petitions (see Election Law § 16-102 [1]; Matter of Galow v Dutchess County Bd. of Elections, 242 AD2d 344 ). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, McGinity, Crane and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Galow v. Dutchess County Board of Elections 242 AD2d 344 p. 398