Majority
p. 608Jill Isaacs, Respondent, v Charles Isaacs, Appellant. [747 NYS2d 361]
The interim $25,000 fee award was a proper exercise of discretion under Domestic Relations Law § 238 (see Silberman v Silberman, 216 AD2d 41 , appeal dismissed 86 NY2d 835 ). Any right defendant had to a hearing on plaintiff’s cross mo
p. 609
tion was waived by his failure to object to its determination on the papers submitted, or to otherwise request a hearing (see Beal v Beal, 196 AD2d 471 , 473). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Buckley, Sullivan and Lerner, JJ.
Cases cited
- Silberman v. Silberman 216 AD2d 41 p. 608