Curtin v. Phipps Houses Services, Inc. — 297 A.D.2d 700

Majority

p. 700

Pauline Curtin, Respondent, v Phipps Houses Services, Inc., Appellant.

[747 NYS2d 388]

The defendant failed to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 , 324; Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851 ). In view of the foregoing, it is not necessary to consider the sufficiency of the opposing papers (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., supra). Altman, J.P., S. Miller, McGinity, Schmidt and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Cases cited

Alvarez v. Prospect Hospital 68 NY2d 320 N.Y. 1986-11-11 at 324 p. 700
Winegrad v. New York University Medical Center 64 NY2d 851 N.Y. 1985-02-12 p. 700