Majority
p. 795Pierre Rosarky, Respondent, v Terry Rifkin, Appellant, et al., Defendant. [748 NYS2d 64]
The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s cross motion for summary judgment. After the appellant made out a prima facie case, the affirmations submitted by the plaintiff’s experts in opposition raised triable issues of fact (see CPLR 3212; Barone v Flynn, 284 AD2d 422 , 423; Campea v Mitra, 267 AD2d 190 , 191; Stepanian v Goldstein, 239 AD2d 569 , 570; Taylor v St. Vincent’s Med. Ctr. of Richmond, 236 AD2d 461 , 462; Licausie v North Shore Orthopedic Group, 232 AD2d 612 , 613; Seidman v Booth Mem. Med. Ctr., 202 AD2d 490 , 491; cf. Holbrook v United Hosp. Med. Ctr., 248 AD2d 358 , 359). S. Miller, J.P., Crane, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Campea v. Mitra 267 AD2d 190 at 191 p. 795
- Licausie v. North Shore Orthopedic Group 232 AD2d 612 at 613 p. 795
- Seidman v. Booth Memorial Medical Center 202 AD2d 490 at 491 p. 795
- Holbrook v. United Hospital Medical Center 248 AD2d 358 at 359 p. 795