Kane-Dabu v. Dabu

297 A.D.2d 815 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2002-09-30 English

Contents

Majority

p. 815

In the Matter of Colleen Kane-Dabu, Appellant, v Ferdinand Dabu, Respondent.

[747 NYS2d 809]

The Family Court, although, in effect, finding that it had jurisdiction, providently exercised its discretion in determining that New York is an inconvenient forum for resolution of the issues raised in the proceeding (see Domestic Relations Law § 75-h).

p. 816

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J.P., Goldstein, H. Miller and Rivera, JJ., concur.