Majority
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered October 17, 2001, which granted plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim and denied defendants’ cross motion to dismiss plaintiffs Labor Law and common-law negligence claims, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant defendants’ cross motion to the extent of dismissing plaintiffs Labor Law § 200 claim, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff’s Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence claims should, however, have been dismissed since, inter alia, defendants did not exercise supervisory control over the work performed on the premises (see Rizzuto v Wenger Contr. Co., 91 NY2d 343 , 352).
Finally, summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s Labor Law § 241 (6) claim alleging violation of 12 NYCRR 23-1.7 (f) was properly denied (see Sponholz v Benderson Prop. Dev., 273 AD2d 791 , 792). Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Buckley, Ellerin, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.
Cases cited
- Hargobin v. K.A.F.C.I. Corp. 282 AD2d 31 p. 125
- Almanzar v. Goval Realty Corp. 286 AD2d 278 p. 125
- Bataraga v. Burdick 261 AD2d 106 p. 125
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co. 81 NY2d 494 at 501 p. 125
- Rizzuto v. L.A. Wenger Contracting Co. 91 NY2d 343 at 352 p. 125
- Sponholz v. Benderson Property Development, Inc. 273 AD2d 791 at 792 p. 125