Majority
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), rendered March 27, 2000, convicting him of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 ), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).
The defendant’s contention that his adjudication as a persistent violent felony offender violated his right to a jury trial is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit (see People v Rosen, 96 NY2d 329 , 335, cert denied 534 US 899 ).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 ).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Santucci, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Contes 60 NY2d 620 p. 409
- People v. Rosen 96 NY2d 329 at 335 p. 409
- People v. Suitte 90 AD2d 80 p. 409