Majority
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Honorof, J.), rendered April 16, 2001, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant failed to establish that he had a legitimate expectation of privacy in the stolen printer. Thus, he lacked standing to challenge the validity of the search of the printer (see People v Ramirez-Portoreal, 88 NY2d 99 , 108-109; People v Walker, 192 AD2d 734 , 735; People v Jaime, 171 AD2d 884 , 885; People v Metz, 168 AD2d 515 , 516).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Smith, J.P., McGinity, Luciano and Crane, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Ramirez-Portoreal 88 NY2d 99 at 108-109 p. 604
- People v. Walker 192 AD2d 734 at 735 p. 604
- People v. Jaime 171 AD2d 884 at 885 p. 604
- People v. Metz 168 AD2d 515 at 516 p. 604