Majority
Appeal by the de
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
While police officers were attempting to gain access to the defendant’s apartment to arrest him in connection with a prior assault, one police officer encountered a woman who appeared on the scene. The woman claimed to reside with the defendant as his “live-in girlfriend.” She voluntarily consented to a search of the apartment which was to take place following the defendant’s arrest. In fact, she gave such consent on two occasions. The consent by this co-occupant of the apartment furnished justification for the ensuing warrantless search (see United States v Matlock, 415 US 164 ; People v Cosme, 48 NY2d 286 ; People v Garnsey, 288 AD2d 761 ; People v Fayton, 276 AD2d 339 ; People v Bostic, 222 AD2d 1073 ; People v Beriguette, 199 AD2d 515 ; People v Perez, 185 AD2d 330 ). Altman, J.P., Goldstein, McGinity and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- United States v. Matlock 415 US 164 p. 427
- People v. Cosme 48 NY2d 286 p. 427
- People v. Garnsey 288 AD2d 761 p. 427
- People v. Fayton 276 AD2d 339 p. 427
- People v. Beriguette 199 AD2d 515 p. 427