Majority
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weber, J.), rendered September 29, 1998, convicting him of burglary in the third degree (two counts), attempted burglary in the third degree (two counts), and possession of burglar’s tools, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt under the second count of the indictment for burglary in the third degree is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bynum, 70 NY2d 858 ; People v Fryar, 276 AD2d 641 ). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 ), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of that count beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 ). Altman, J.P., Goldstein, McGinity and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Smith 92 NY2d 516 at 520 p. 563
- People v. Slaughter 78 NY2d 485 at 491 p. 563
- People v. Sawyer 57 NY2d 12 at 21 p. 563
- John Cuneo, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board 459 US 1178 p. 563
- People v. Vivenzio 62 NY2d 775 p. 563
- People v. Bynum 70 NY2d 858 p. 563
- People v. Contes 60 NY2d 620 p. 563
- People v. Suitte 90 AD2d 80 p. 563