Hyperlawhypertext legal database Ace Tackless Corp. v. American Tackless Corp. 3 A.D.2d 672

← Cases

Ace Tackless Corp. v. American Tackless Corp.

3 A.D.2d 672 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1957-01-21 English

Contents

Majority

p. 672
Ace Tackless Corporation, Respondent, v. American Tackless Corporation et al.,Defendants, and Irving Alexander et al., Appellants.

Appeal from an order granting a motion to vacate appellants’ notice to examine respondent before trial. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied; the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Appellants are entitled to examine respondent to establish their affirmative defense that the contract sued upon is illegal (Borger v. Buegg, 272 App. Div. 917 ; Schatzlcin v. State Laundry Co., 63 N. Y. S. 2d 446 ). Wenzel, Acting P. J,, Beldoek, Murphy, TTahetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., corieur,