← Cases

Eliasco v. Eliasco

3 A.D.2d 989 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1957-06-04 English

Contents

Majority

p. 989
Angelica Eliasco, Appellant, v. Theodore J. Eliasco, Respondent.

In the absence of an affidavit by the defendant stating that he was not served with the summons and complaint — the fact of the service and a description of the circumstances having been attested to by the affidavit in opposition — the moving papers are insufficient to raise any issue. Order vacating the service pending a reference to hear and report was unwarranted and must be reversed. As defendant is now overseas, he should be afforded a reasonable opportunity to answer or otherwise move with respect to the complaint. Settle order accordingly on notice. Concur — Botein, J. P., Rabin, McNally and Bergan, JJ.