← Cases

Molino v. County of Putnam

30 A.D.2d 929 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1968-09-30 English

Contents

Majority

p. 929
Blanche Molino, as Administratrix of the Estate of Carol A. Molino, Deceased, Appellant, v. County of Putnam et al., Defendants, and Michael J. Prodoti, Respondent.

Order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, dated May 20, 1968, which granted respondent’s motion to amend his answer so as to include the defense of res judicata, reversed, on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. In our opinion, the defense of res judicata which respondent seeks to interpose in his amended answer is not available against appellant, who was not a party or in privity with the defendant in the litigation which resulted in the prior judgment (cf. B. R. De Witt, Inc. v. Hall, 19 N Y 2d 141 ; Cummings v. Dresher, 18 N Y 2d 105 , 107-108; Brooks v. Horning, 27 A D 2d 874 ). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cases cited