Hyperlawhypertext legal database Wachter v. City of New York 300 A.D.2d 129

← Cases

Wachter v. City of New York

300 A.D.2d 129 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2002-12-17 English

Contents

Majority

p. 129
Ruby Wachter, Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent, et al., Defendants.
[750 NYS2d 761]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered on or about May 31, 2001, which denied plaintiffs motion to restore the action, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs,

p. 130
the motion granted, and the matter remanded for further proceedings.

As conceded by defendant City, plaintiffs pre-note of issue case should not have been struck from the calendar pursuant to CPLR 3404 (see Johnson v Sam Minskoff & Sons, 287 AD2d 233 , 235), and, in view of that circumstance and the absence of any other ground for marking the case off the calendar, plaintiffs motion to restore should have been granted. Concur— Tom, J.P., Buckley, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cases cited