Majority
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lipp, J.), rendered December 20, 1995, convicting her of manslaughter in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant did not preserve for appellate review her contention that the justification defense was not disproven beyond a reasonable doubt (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 , 19 [1995]; People v Nery, 243 AD2d 585 [1997]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to disprove the defense of
The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court erred in its justification charge is unpreserved for appellate review because she did not except to the charge as given (see CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the Supreme Court essentially gave the defendant the charge she requested concerning the factual issue of whether the store was her dwelling (but see People v Hernandez, 98 NY2d 175 , 182-183 [2002]), by telling the jury that the defendant had no duty to retreat if she were in her own dwelling.
The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 , 83 [1982]). Krausman, J.P., Schmidt, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Gray 86 NY2d 10 at 19 p. 539
- People v. Contes 60 NY2d 620 p. 539
- People v. Hernandez 98 NY2d 175 at 182-183 p. 540
- People v. Suitte 90 AD2d 80 at 83 p. 540