Majority
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Katz, J.), rendered August 26, 1999, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree and assault in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt of attempted murder in the second degree and assault in the first degree is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 , 19 [1995]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245 , 250 [1989]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 330.30 to set
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Santucci, J.P., Krausman, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Gray 86 NY2d 10 at 19 p. 609
- People v. Udzinski 146 AD2d 245 at 250 p. 609
- People v. Contes 60 NY2d 620 p. 609
- People v. Salemi 309 NY 208 at 215 p. 610
- People v. Baxley 84 NY2d 208 p. 610
- Matott v. Ward 48 NY2d 455 at 459 p. 610
- People v. Suitte 90 AD2d 80 p. 610