Majority
Appeal from a judg
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Contrary to the contention of defendant, the record establishes that his waiver of the right to appeal was knowing, intelligent and voluntary (see People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909 , 910-911 [1990]; cf. People v Brown, 296 AD2d 860 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 767 [2002]), and that waiver encompasses his contentions with respect to County Court’s suppression ruling (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831 , 833 [1999]) and the severity of the sentence (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733 , 737 [1998]). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Scudder, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Moissett 76 NY2d 909 at 910-911 p. 755
- People v. Kemp 94 NY2d 831 at 833 p. 755
- People v. Hidalgo 91 NY2d 733 at 737 p. 755