Hyperlawhypertext legal database Hale House Center, Inc. v. Michael Lee & Co. 308 A.D.2d 390

← Cases

Hale House Center, Inc. v. Michael Lee & Co.

308 A.D.2d 390 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2003-09-23 English

Contents

Majority

p. 390
Hale House Center, Inc., et al., Respondents, v Michael Lee and Company, Appellant.
[764 NYS2d 626]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered April 30, 2003, which, in an action for accountant malpractice and breach of contract, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, with leave to renew upon completion of disclosure, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

p. 391
Additional disclosure is necessary on the merits, as well as on the threshold statute of limitations issue and related continuous representation doctrine (see Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 252 AD2d 179 , 205 [1998]), before summary disposition can be considered. Concur — Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Tom, Mazzarelli and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cases cited