Majority
—Judgment, Supreme
The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 , 495 [1987]).
The trial court’s decision to preclude a defense witness was not an improvident exercise of discretion (see People v Aska, 91 NY2d 979 [1998]).
We reject defendant’s conflict of interest claim, and agree with the reasoning of the court in Skinner v Duncan ( 2003 WL 21386032 , *40-49, 2003 US Dist LEXIS 10102 , *144-181 [SD NY, June 17, 2003]), which rejected a similar claim involving the same defense attorney.
We find the sentence excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Buckley, P.J., Tom, Ellerin, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Bleakley 69 NY2d 490 at 495 p. 396
- People v. Aska 91 NY2d 979 p. 396