Hyperlawhypertext legal database Reed v. City of Syracuse 309 A.D.2d 1197

← Cases

Reed v. City of Syracuse

309 A.D.2d 1197 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2003-10-02 Docket Appeal No. 2 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1197
Rudolph L. Reed, Plaintiff, v City of Syracuse, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff. David A. Hudson, Third-Party Defendant. David A. Hudson, Second Third-Party Plaintiff, v Rudolph L. Reed et al., Second Third-Party Defendants-Appellants-Respondents, and City of Syracuse, Second Third-Party Defendant-Respondent-Appellant.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[765 NYS2d 299]

Appeal and cross appeal from an order and judgment (one document) of Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Major, J.), entered March 14, 2002, which granted the motion of the City of Syracuse for summary judgment dismissing the cross claim of the County of Onondaga.

p. 1198
It is hereby ordered that said cross appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed and the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as Reed v City of Syracuse ( 309 AD2d 1195 [2003]). Present — Green, J.P., Wisner, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Cases cited