Hyperlawhypertext legal database Buckeye Pipeline Co. v. Congel-Hazard, Inc. 41 A.D.2d 590

← Cases

Buckeye Pipeline Co. v. Congel-Hazard, Inc.

41 A.D.2d 590 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1973-01-18 Docket Appeal No. 2 English

Contents

Majority

p. 590
Buckeye Pipeline Company, Inc., Appellant, v. Congel-Hazard, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff. Samuel W. Williams, Jr., et al., Doing Business as O’Brien & Gere, Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.
(Appeal No. 2.)

Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Same memorandum as in Buckeye Pipeline Co. v. Congel-Hazard (41 A D 2d 590) decided herewith. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga Trial Term dismissing complaint in action for damages to pipeline.) Present — Goldman, P.