Majority
Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed December 21, 1971, which disallowed a claim for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Angelo Rizzo, employed as a hall man and elevator operator in an apartment building for 30 years, became involved on January 29, 1969 in a heated argument with his supervisor over what he felt was an overpayment of his wages. He believed that he was receiving payment for unused sick leave when he had previously been paid for same. After about five minutes of argument, Rizzo accompanied the supervisor to the latter’s apartment to call his wife to check his payroll records and prove that he was right. Apparently, he was still in an excited state and, while on the phone, suffered a cerebral hemorrhage. There is medical evidence in the record that the hemorrhage
Cases cited
- Claim of Strauss v. Freiheit 35 N Y 2d 780 p. 982
- Claim of Zygler v. Tenzer Coat Co. 15 N Y 2d 562 p. 982
- Claim of Cramer v. Barney's Clothing Store 15 A D 2d 329 p. 982
- Claim of Cramer v. Barney's Clothing Store 13 N Y 2d 711 p. 982
- Claim of Santacroce v. 40 W. 20th Street, Inc. 9 A D 2d 985 p. 982
- Claim of Santacroce v. 40 W. 20th Street, Inc. 10 N Y 2d 855 p. 982