← Cases

Claim of Gurewicz v. 107 N. Fifth St. Corp.

48 A.D.2d 990 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1975-06-26 English

Contents

Majority

p. 990
In the Matter of the Claim of Joseph Gurewicz, Respondent, v 107 N. Fifth St. Corp. et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed May 23, 1974. It is not disputed that claimant, a part-time bartender, sustained a compensable accident on May 6, 1972. The sole issue is how the computation of benefits should be handled. The board found that claimant sustained a schedule loss of 714% of the left arm. However, since claimant only worked one day a week as a bartender for which he earned $25, the board computed the award pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 14 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law resulting in an average weekly wage of $96.15 and a rate of $64. The board could properly utilize this method on the instant record (e.g. Matter of Birtolo v First Housing Co., 41 AD2d 872 ; Matter of Ednie v Five Star Beverage Co., 16 AD2d 845 ; Matter of Stallone v Liebmann Breweries, 12 AD2d 716 , affd 10 NY2d 907 ). Appellants would in effect have this court overrule these prior decisions but it is properly a function of the Legislature to effect such a change and it has not done so in the 15 years since the decision in Stallone. Nor is the limitation contained in subdivision 6 of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law applica

p. 991
ble since involved here is a schedule award. Accordingly, the decision of the board must be upheld. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Herlihy, P.J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cases cited