Majority
This proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the State Liquor Authority suspending petitioner’s restaurant liquor license has been transferred to this court (Uiv. Prac. Act, § 1296). The license was suspended on findings that petitioner had violated subdivision 6 of section 106 of the Alcoholie Beverage Control Law “in that he suffered or permitted a patron to be assaulted therein.” Determination annulled, without costs. The suspension was based on a single assault by petitioner’s bartender committed at a time when petitioner was not present. This was insufficient to sustain the charge that petitioner had suffered or permitted the licensed premises to become disorderly (Matter of Brody v. Rohan, 1 A D 2d 661 ; Matter of Migliaccio v. O’Connell, 307 N. Y. 566 ). Nor was the evidence in any way sufficient to justify a finding that petitioner acquiesced in the assault (Matter of Stanwood United v. O’Connell, 283 App. Div. 79 , affd. 306 N. Y. 749 ).
Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Migliaccio v. O'Connell 307 N. Y. 566 p. 870
- Stanwood United, Inc. v. O'Connell 306 N. Y. 749 p. 870