Majority
— In an action to reform a lease, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 7, 1974, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. Plaintiff seeks to reform a written lease on the grounds of his mistake and the concealment of a lease provision by the defendant landlord, which provision, he contends, the landlord was duty bound to disclose. To warrant reformation of a lease, a showing must be made either of mutual mistake or of unilateral mistake accompanied by fraud (Barash v Pennsylvania Term. Real Estate Corp., 26 NY2d 77 ; Amend v Hurley, 293 NY 587 ). Such a showing has not been made in this case (cf. Pimpinello v
Cases cited
- Barash v. Pennsylvania Terminal Real Estate Corp. 26 NY2d 77 p. 558
- Amend v. Hurley 293 NY 587 p. 558
- Pimpinello v. Swift & Co. 253 NY 159 p. 559