← Cases

Rome Urban Renewal Agency v. Palma

51 A.D.2d 645 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1976-01-09 English

Contents

Majority

p. 645
Rome Urban Renewal Agency, Respondent, v Carl Palma et al., Appellants.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated at Special Term, Hancock, J. (Appeal from order of Oneida Supreme Court in condemnation proceeding.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Cardamone and Witmer, JJ.