Hyperlawhypertext legal database Ingersoll v. Marine Midland Bank-Central 54 A.D.2d 602

← Cases

Ingersoll v. Marine Midland Bank-Central

54 A.D.2d 602 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1976-09-24 English

Contents

Majority

p. 602
Leo Ingersoll, Doing Business under the Name of Arrow Refrigeration Co., Respondent, v Marine Midland Bank-Central, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly denied because the case presents issues of fact for trial, including the conduct both of the defendant and of the plaintiff (see Uniform Commercial Code, § 3-406, and Comment thereunder in McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 6214, Part II, p 263, par 6). (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court&emdash;summary judgment.) Present&emdash;Marsh, P. J., Mahoney, Dillon, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.