State Division of Human Rights v. Pomeranc

Determination unanimously confirmed, with costs, petition dismissed and cross motion for order of enforcement granted. Memorandum: The findings of fact are supported by sufficient evidence on the record considered as a whole and are conclusive upon this court (Executive Law, § 298; City of Schenectady v State Div. of Human Rights, 37 NY2d 421 , 424). The ordering paragraphs are proper and entitled to be enforced on the division’s cross motion seeking an order of enforcement (Batavia Lodge No. 196, Loyal Order of Moose v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 35 NY2d 143 ; Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v Gillotte, 41 AD2d 890 ; Matter of Moskal v State of New York, 36 AD2d 46 , 49). (Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law, § 298.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Simons, Hancock, Jr., and Denman, JJ.