← Cases

In re Hudson

68 A.D.2d 338 Court Second Department, Decision date 1979-06-04 English

Contents

Majority

p. 338
In the Matter of Harold Richard Hudson, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner.
Second Department,
June 4, 1979
APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL
Francis F. Doran (James R. Augenthaler of counsel), for petitioner.

OPINION OF THE COURT

The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on June 23, 1954.

On November 27, 1978, the respondent pleaded guilty to the crime of grand larceny in the second degree, a class D felony (see Penal Law, § 155.35). On January 15, 1979 the respondent was sentenced to a definite term of six months’ imprisonment.

Pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law, the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor at law in this State upon his conviction of a felony.

Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion is granted. The clerk of

p. 339
this court is directed to strike the respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law forthwith.

Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Titone, Suozzi and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Statutes and regulations cited