Padlo v. Spoor — 72 A.D.2d 665

Majority

p. 665

Joan G. Padlo, Respondent, v Margaret Spoor, Defendant, Thomas Spoor, Appellant, and Stanley A. Laskowski, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs on the opinion at Special Term, Bayger, J. (See, also, Plath v Justus, 28 NY2d 16 ; Winnick v Kupperman Constr. Co., 29 AD2d 261 ; Restatement Agency 2d, §217, subd [b], par [ii].) (Appeal from order of Niagara Supreme Court—dismiss complaint.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Callahan and Witmer, JJ. [ 90 Misc 2d 1002 .]

Cases cited

Plath v. Justus 28 NY2d 16 N.Y. 1971-02-17 p. 665
Winnick v. Kupperman Construction Co. 29 AD2d 261 N.Y. App. Div. 1968-02-19 p. 665
Padlo v. Spoor 90 Misc 2d 1002 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1977-07-15 p. 665