Majority
p. 1044In the Matter of Rochester Urban Renewal Agency, Respondent, v Hammer Lithograph, Appellant.
Order and judgment unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: This appeal arises from a condemnation proceeding brought by Rochester Urban Renewal Agency to acquire certain real property owned by the Hammer Lithograph Corporation. The court below
p. 1045
granted Hammer Lithograph a total award of $160,894, and an additional allowance of $6,435.76 for costs. We affirm the award but note that, in computing the total amount, the court made a mathematical error. The total award, as corrected, is $160,864. The additional allowance granted by the court of 4% of the total award should be modified upward to 5% of the award (see Condemnation Law, § 16, subd [2]). In view of the purpose of this allowance to defray the expenses which an owner incurs in establishing the value of his property (New York State Urban Dev. Corp. v Goldfeld, 54 AD2d 1099 ; Matter of Dodge v Tierney, 40 AD2d 936 ) and, in view of the substantial expenses Hammer Lithograph has incurred, the court abused its discretion by failing to grant the full 5% allowance (see Matter of Speach v Smith, 53 AD2d 1024 ). (Appeal from order and judgment of Monroe Supreme Court—condemnation.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Doerr and Moule, JJ.
Cases cited
- New York State Urban Development Corp. v. Goldfeld 54 AD2d 1099 p. 1045
- Dodge v. Tierney 40 AD2d 936 p. 1045
- Speach v. Smith 53 AD2d 1024 p. 1045