← Cases

Moxley v. Meese

84 A.D.2d 673 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1981-10-30 English

Contents

Majority

p. 673
Stephen Moxley, Respondent, v Harold F. Meese, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with same memorandum as in Danahy v Meese ( 84 AD2d 670 ). (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court, Mintz, J. — strike answer — summary judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Simons, Callahan, Denman and Moule, JJ.