Majority
Order of enforcement unanimously granted and cross petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: The Court of Appeals, on a previous appeal, remitted this matter for a hearing to determine whether retaining complainant in his position, while permitting him to observe his Sabbath, would result in undue economic hardship to the employer (State Div. of Human Rights v Carnation Co., 42 NY2d 873 ). On remission to the State Division of Human Rights, the respondent Carnation Company submitted no cost analysis to support its plant foreman’s opinion that accommodating the employee would have a “noticeable effect” on Carnation’s costs. The commissioner found that Carnation Company “did not sustain the burden of proof required by section 296.10(c) [of the
Cases cited
- State Division of Human Rights v. Carnation Co. 42 NY2d 873 p. 977
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human Rights 45 NY2d 176 at 182 p. 978
- State Division of Human Rights v. Genesee Hospital 68 AD2d 692 at 703 p. 978
- Genesee Hospital v. State Division of Human Rights 50 NY2d 917 p. 978