← Cases

Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A. v. Fritz

89 A.D.2d 991 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1982-09-16 English

Contents

Majority

p. 991
Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A., Respondent-Appellant, v Peter Fritz, Individually and as Agent, for Warren Holding Co., et al., Appellants-Respondents, et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) (And Three Other Actions.)

On the court’s own motion, the decision and order (both dated September 7, 1982) in the above-captioned matter are amended nunc pro tunc so that the decretal paragraph reads as follows: Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, by providing that there shall be a recomputation of the amount due Chase Manhattan Bank, N.

p. 992
remitted to Trial Term for entry of an appropriate amended judgment in accordance herewith. Mollen, P. J., Niehoff, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.