Hyperlawhypertext legal database Chernick v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 9 A.D.2d 700

← Cases

Chernick v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

9 A.D.2d 700 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1959-10-01 English

Contents

Majority

p. 700
Arlene Chernick, an Infant by Sidney Chernick, Her Guardian ad Litem, et al., Appellants, v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co., Respondent.

Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals on a certified question. Motion granted, without costs, and this court certifies the following question: Is the exelusory language of section 1448 of the Civil Practice Act with reference to an infant applicable to the arbitration provision of the uninsured automobile coverage indorsement? Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.