← Cases

Vendall, Inc. v. Statler Manufacturing Corp.

9 A.D.2d 934 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1959-12-28 English

Contents

Majority

p. 934
Vendall, Inc., Appellant, v. Statler Manufacturing Corp. et al., Respondents.

Appeal from an order which granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the second amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action. The action is to recover damages for wrongful interference with negotiations between appellant and a third party which, but for such interference, would have resulted in a contract. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. In our opinion, the complaint is sufficient within the rule laid down in Williams £• Co. V. Collins Tuttle & Co. ( 6 A D 2d 302 ) and Korn v. Isbrandtsen Co. ( 4 A D 2d 855 ). The deficiencies pointed out in the prior appeals in this action (Vendall, Inc., v. Statler Mfg. Gorp., 5 A D 2d 882 , 7 A D 2d 936 ) have been overcome in the present pleading. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cases cited