Hyperlawhypertext legal database Cuda v. Utica Mutual Insurance 91 A.D.2d 1166

← Cases

Cuda v. Utica Mutual Insurance

91 A.D.2d 1166 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1983-01-21 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1166
Francis T. Cuda, Respondent-Appellant, v Utica Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant, and George Abdella, Appellant-Respondent.

— Order affirmed, with costs to plaintiff, for the reasons stated in the memorandum decision at Special Term, Murphy, J. As to plaintiff’s cross appeal, we note that the interest penalty provided for in subdivision 1 of section 675 of the Insurance Law may not be assessed against other than the insurer. All concur, Simons, J., not participating. (Appeals from order of Supreme Court, Herkimer County, Murphy, J. — attorney’s fee.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Simons, Doerr, Boomer and Moule, JJ.