Hyperlawhypertext legal database City of Niagara Falls v. Rudolph 99 A.D.2d 676

← Cases

City of Niagara Falls v. Rudolph

99 A.D.2d 676 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1984-01-27 English

Contents

Majority

p. 676
City of Niagara Falls, Respondent, v Paul M. Rudolph et al., Defendants, and Albert Elia Building Company, Inc., Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Under all of the circumstances we cannot say that it was an abuse of discretion to stay the execution of summary judgment granted to defendant in its third counterclaim pending a determination of plaintiff’s action against defendant (see Marine Midland Bank v Stukey, 55 NY2d 633 ). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Ostrowski, J. —partial summary judgment.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Denman, Boomer and Moule, JJ.

Cases cited