Hyperlawhypertext legal database Robins v. Karp 99 A.D.2d 980

← Cases

Robins v. Karp

99 A.D.2d 980 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1984-03-08 English

Decision Majority · Concurring — Silverman, J.,

Contents
p. 980
Craig Robins v Harry Karp et al.

Motion for reargument denied. Concur Ross, J. P., Lynch, Milonas and Kassal, JJ.

amends his concurring memorandum ( 98 AD2d 671 ) so as to substitute for the last three sentences the following: “At the time I wrote my original concurring memorandum I had overlooked the fact that a transcript of the testimony had been furnished us. However, I am not persuaded that we should overrule the findings of fact of the Trial Judge based upon testimony by witnesses who appeared before the Trial Judge.”