Majority
— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Harms, J), rendered November 30, 1999, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Williams, 247 AD2d 416 [1998]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Williams, 84 NY2d 925 , 926 [1994]).
The defendant contends that the jury should not have believed the prosecution’s witness. However, issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are pri
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Prudenti, P.J., Altman, Smith and Crane, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Williams 247 AD2d 416 p. 541
- People v. Contes 60 NY2d 620 p. 541
- People v. Williams 84 NY2d 925 at 926 p. 541
- People v. Garafolo 44 AD2d 86 at 88 p. 542
- People v. Suitte 90 AD2d 80 p. 542