Majority
Appeal from an amended judgment (denominated amended order) of Supreme Court, Monroe County (Sirkiri, J.), entered March 28, 2003, which dismissed the CPLR article 78 petition.
It is hereby ordered that said amended judgment be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking to invalidate the action of respondent County of Monroe (County) and its licensee, respondent LeBeau, Inc., doing business as Beau Productions, Inc. (LeBeau), in charging members of the general public a per-vehicle admission fee to drive through a section of Northampton County Park and view a seasonal light display erected by LeBeau. Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the imposition of a fee to drive past the light show does not violate County Law § 221, which in pertinent part provides that “county parks shall be kept and maintained for the free use of the public, subject to such regulations as the [county legislature] may impose.” The record establishes that the fee is charged only to occupants of vehicles who seek to drive past the light show, which lasts only a few hours per evening approximately eight weeks per year. Even during that eight-week period, the park remains completely open and accessible during daylight hours to all members of the public, in or out of vehicles, without charge. Moreover, even during the evening hours when the light show is presented, almost all of the park remains open to vehicular traffic without impediment or charge. Further, there is free pedestrian access throughout the park at all times, even to the light show itself. We thus conclude that neither petitioner nor anyone else has been deprived of the “free use” of the park (§ 221).
In any event, the County’s action in granting to LeBeau the right to operate the light show in the County park and to charge
Cases cited
- 795 Fifth Avenue Corp. v. City of New York 15 NY2d 221 at 225-226 p. 977
- Committee to Preserve Brighton Beach & Manhattan Beach, Inc. v. Planning Commission of New York 259 AD2d 26 at 36 p. 977
- Davis v. City of New York 50 Misc 2d 275 at 279-280 p. 977
- Williams v. Gallatin 229 NY 248 at 253-254 p. 977
- In re the Assessment of the Cost & Expense of the Improvement of Central Parkway 140 Misc 727 at 729 p. 977