Majority
Substantial evidence supports the conclusion that petitioner continued to be a member of a drug conspiracy until her arrest in mid-May 2009, which was during her first two weeks as a public housing tenant (see generally 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc, v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176 , 180-181 [1978]). Al
Petitioner’s claim that NYCHA failed to adhere to its pretermination procedures is unpreserved because it was not raised before the agency (see Matter of Hughes v Suffolk County Dept. of Civ. Serv., 74 NY2d 833 , 834 [1989]), and, in any event, is not supported by the record.
The termination of petitioner’s tenancy does not shock our sense of fairness (see e.g. Latoni v New York City Hous. Auth., 95 AD3d 611 [1st Dept 2012]). Concur — Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Acosta, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.
Cases cited
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human Rights 45 NY2d 176 at 180-181 p. 420
- Hughes v. Suffolk County Department of Civil Service 74 NY2d 833 at 834 p. 421
- Latoni v. New York City Housing Authority 95 AD3d 611 p. 421