Majority
p. 482The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Randolph, Appellant. [954 NYS2d 868]
The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]), and we do not find that term to be excessive. We have no authority to revisit defendant’s prison sentence on this appeal (see id. at 635 ). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Acosta and Román, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Lingle 16 NY3d 621 p. 482