← Cases

People v. Tucker

101 A.D.3d 764 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2012-12-05 English

Contents

Majority

p. 764
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Tucker, Appellant.
[954 NYS2d 491]

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California ( 386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Mastro, J.P., Angiolillo, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur.

Cases cited