Majority
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lawliss, J.), entered June 13, 2012 in Clinton County, which partially granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to annul a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a determination finding him guilty of violating four
We disagree and affirm. Petitioner raises contentions regarding whether the search of his cell that disclosed the alcohol was justified and, in turn, whether he was improperly denied the right to present evidence on that issue. Even assuming that these arguments are properly before us, “the basis for the search in the first instance was irrelevant to the issue of whether petitioner possessed the [alcohol]” and did not warrant exploration at the disciplinary hearing (Matter of Sweeter v Coughlin, 221 AD2d 741 , 741 [1995]; see Matter of Mullady v Bezio, 87 AD3d 765 , 766 [2011]).
Mercure, J.P, Stein, McCarthy and Egan Jr., JJ., concur.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Cases cited
- Sweeter v. Coughlin 221 AD2d 741 at 741 p. 1290
- Mullady v. Bezio 87 AD3d 765 at 766 p. 1290