Majority
The facts of this case are more fully set out in our decision affirming a determination of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits due to his commission of a felony in connection with his employment (Matter of Engel [Commissioner of Labor], 106 AD3d 1318 [2013] [decided herewith]). Substantial evidence supports the Board’s separate decision that claimant’s behavior constituted disqualifying misconduct within the meaning of Labor Law § 593 (3) and that wages he received as a result of such employment cannot be used as the basis for a valid claim for benefits (see Labor Law § 527; Matter of Sinker [Sweeney], 89 NY2d 485 , 488 [1997]; Matter of Vetro [Commissioner of Labor], 94 AD3d 1321 , 1321 [2012]).
Peters, EJ., Rose, Stein and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Cases cited
- In re the Claim of Sinker 89 NY2d 485 at 488 p. 1319
- In re the Claim of Vetro 94 AD3d 1321 at 1321 p. 1319