Majority
— Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Michael F. Pietruszka, J.), rendered August 26, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 , 256 [2006]), and that valid waiver forecloses any challenge by defendant to the severity of the sentence (see id. at 255 ; see generally People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825 , 827 [1998]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733 , 737 [1998]).
We have considered defendant’s contentions in his pro se supplemental brief and conclude that they are without merit. Present — Scudder, EJ., Peradotto, Garni, Whalen and Martoche, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Lopez 6 NY3d 248 at 256 p. 1444
- People v. Lococo 92 NY2d 825 at 827 p. 1444
- People v. Hidalgo 91 NY2d 733 at 737 p. 1444